Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Attitudes of latin american teachers towards educational innovation

Actitudes del profesorado latinoamericano hacia la innovación educativa




Section
Artículos

How to Cite
Rodríguez-Torres, Ángel-F., López-Belmonte, J., Marín-Marín, J.-A., & Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J. (2025). Attitudes of latin american teachers towards educational innovation. Revista Lasallista De Investigación, 21(2), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.22507/

Dimensions
PlumX

Ángel-Freddy Rodríguez-Torres,

Doctor en Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad Central del Ecuador. Docente investigador y miembro del grupo EducaTech-XXI. 


Jesús López-Belmonte,

Doctor en Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Granada. Docente investigador del grupo EducaTech-XXI. 


José-Antonio Marín-Marín,

Doctor en Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Granada. Docente investigador del grupo EducaTech-XXI.


Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero,

Doctor en Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Granada. Docente investigador del grupo EducaTech-XXI.


Introduction. Current education is in a process of constant updating as a result of technological advances. Objective. This study aims to analyze the dimensions associated with teaching innovation (teaching motivation and dedication, new methodologies, opportunity of context and revaluation of teaching), exploring their relationships, significant differences and the effects generated by variables such as gender, age, length of service and educational level. Materials and methods. For this purpose, a quantitative methodology of a descriptive, transversal and predictive nature has been carried out in a sample of 752 teachers from Latin America. Data collection was carried out using a validated questionnaire (QUACINE). Results. The results indicate that the dimensions applied are related to each other, which reinforces that the predisposition towards innovation in teaching and learning processes generates improvement in all dimensions. Teachers value the application of innovative pedagogical methods positively. Conclusions: Teachers with less than 10 years of teaching experience tend to value the dimensions of methodology and revaluation more positively than the rest of the teachers with more than 10 years of experience. Age and length of service may be an explanatory component to determine the predisposition of teachers to apply innovative pedagogical methods in the teaching and learning process.


Article visits 36 | PDF visits 45


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Attard, C. and Holmes, K. (2020). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34, 719-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2.
  2. Cargua-García, A., Posso-Pacheco, R., Cargua-García, N. y Rodríguez-Torres, Á. (2019). La formación del profesorado en el proceso de innovación y cambio educativo (Original). Olimpia. Revista de la Facultad de Cultura Física de la Universidad de Granma, 16(54), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.35305/rece.v2i12.313.
  3. Fix, G., Rikkerink, M., Ritzen, H., Pieters, J. and Kuiper, W. (2020). Learning within sustainable educational innovation: An analysis of teachers’ perceptions and leadership practice. Journal Of Educational Change, 22, 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09410-2.
  4. Gallardo-Córdova, K.E., Lozano Rodríguez, A. y Elizondo García, J. (2019). Innovación educativa en estudios de psicología educativa: un mapeo sistemático. En M. Ramírez-Montoya y J. R. Valenzuela González (Eds.), Innovación educativa: tendencias globales de investigación e implicaciones prácticas (pp. 23-40). Octaedro. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.33222.
  5. Gómez, G., Marín, J., Solá, J. y Bertos, G. (2020). Un acercamiento hacia el estado del arte sobre la investigación en fliped classroom. En I. Aznar, M. Cáceres, S. Alonso y A. Moreno (Coords.), Sociedad 5.0 ante la pandemia: investigación e innovación educativa (pp. 53-66). Octaedro. https://doi.org/10.26457/recein.v14i53.2678.
  6. Greisel, M., Wekerle, C., Wilkes, T., Stark, R. and Kollar, I. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ evidence-informed reasoning: Do attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy facilitate the use of scientific theories to analyze teaching problems? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 22(1), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221113942.
  7. Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2016). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw Hill Education.
  8. Huang, F., Zhao, M., Qi, J. and Zhang, R. (2023). English teachers’ perceptions of emergency remote teaching: Emotional attitudes, professional identity, and coping strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1064963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1064963.
  9. Jury, M., Laurence, A., Cèbe, S. and Desombre, C. (2023). Teachers’ concerns about inclusive education and the links with teachers’ attitudes. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1065919.
  10. Karakose, T., Polat, H., Yirci, R., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., Ozdemir, T. Y. and Demirkol, M. (2023). Assessment of the relationships between prospective mathematics teachers’ classroom management anxiety, academic self-efficacy beliefs, academic amotivation and attitudes toward the teaching profession using structural equation modelling. Mathematics, 11(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020449.
  11. Kim, E., Kim, J. and Han, S. (2021). Understanding Student Acceptance of Online Learning Systems in Higher Education: Application of Social Psychology Theories with Consideration of User Innovativeness. Sustainability, 13(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020896.
  12. Liu, G. and Ma, C. (2023). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316.
  13. Lomer, S., Mittelmeier, J. and Courtney, S. (2023). Typologising internationalisation in UK university strategies: reputation, mission and attitude. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(5), 1042-1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2193729.
  14. López-Belmonte, J., Marín-Marín, J.-A., Segura-Robles, A. and Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J. (2023). Flipped Learning for Promoting Self-regulation, Social Competence, and Decision-making in Pandemic Conditions. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231208772.
  15. Marín-Marín, J., Soler-Costa, R., Moreno-Guerrero, A. and López-Belmonte, J. (2020). Makey Makey as an Interactive Robotic Tool for High School Students’ Learning in Multicultural Contexts. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090239.
  16. Marín-Marín, J.A., López-Belmonte, J., Pozo-Sánchez, S. and Moreno-Guerrero, A.J. (2023). Attitudes Towards the Development of Good Practices with Augmented Reality in Secondary Education Teachers in Spain. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09671-9.
  17. Meneses, G. (2017). Actitudes del profesorado ante la innovación curricular. El caso de la universidad de Tarapacá. [Tesis Doctoral inédita]. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, España. https://doi.org/10.24275/etypuam/ne/322010/reyes.
  18. Moreno-Guerrero, A., Soler-Costa, R., Marín-Marín, J. and López-Belmonte, J. (2021). Flipped learning and good teaching practices in secondary education. Comunicar, 68, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-09.
  19. Papazis, F., Avramidis, E. and Bacopoulou, F. (2023). Greek teachers' resilience levels during the COVID‐19 pandemic lockdown and its association with attitudes towards emergency remote teaching and perceived stress. Psychology in the Schools, 60(5), 1459-1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22709.
  20. Pascual, J. y Navío-Gàmez, A. (2018). Concepciones sobre innovación educativa. ¿Qué significa para los docentes en chile? Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 22(4), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i4.8395.
  21. Pieters, J. M., Voogt, J. M. and Pareja Roblin, N. (Eds.). (2019). Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6.
  22. Pozo-Sánchez, S., Lampropoulos, G. and López-Belmonte, J. (2022). Comparing Gamification Models in Higher Education Using Face-to-Face and Virtual Escape Rooms. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 11(2), 307-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2022.7.1025.
  23. Ramirez-Montoya, M. (2020). Challenges for Open Education with Educational Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(17), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177053.
  24. Real, S., Ramírez, S., Bermúdez, M. y Pino, A. (2020). Las metodologías empleadas en la innovación educativa. Aula de Encuentro, 22(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.17561/ae.v22n1.3.
  25. Rodríguez-Torres, Á., Fierro-Altamirano, R., Vela-Larco, D. y Quijano-Rojas, M. (2018). La resolución de problemas: una oportunidad para aprender a aprender. Olimpia. Revista de la Facultad de Cultura Física de la Universidad de Granma, 15(50), 160-171. https://doi.org/10.17227/01212494.26pys57.66.
  26. Rodríguez-Torres, Ángel-F., Cargua-García, N.-I., Marín-Marín, J.-A., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., and López-Belmonte, J. (2023). Design and validation of the scale to evaluate interdisciplinary work in university students from Ecuador. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (20), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.7698.
  27. Sanz, N. M., Urías, M. D. V., Salgado, L. N., Benítez, N. V. and Martínez, M. C. V. (2023). Educate to transform: An innovative experience for faculty training. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1613-1635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11160-y.
  28. Stevens, T. M., Den Brok, P. J., Noroozi, O. and Biemans, H. J. A. (2023). Teacher profiles in higher education: the move to online education during the COVID-19 crisis. Learning Environments Research, 6, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09458-w.
  29. Traver-Martí, J. y Ferrández-Berrueco, R. (2016). Construcción y validación de un cuestionario de actitudes hacia la innovación educativa en la universidad. Perfiles Educativos, 38(151), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2016.151.54917.
  30. Wang, Q. and Zhao, G. (2023). Exploring the influence of technostress creators on in‐service teachers' attitudes toward ICT and ICT adoption intentions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13315.
  31. Yeşilyurt, E. and Vezne, R. (2023). Digital literacy, technological literacy, and internet literacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11311-1.
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |